Two federal courts hold the use of copyrighted books by Meta and Anthropic as training data for AI systems does not infringe ...

This is the first time a judge found that an AI company's use of copyrighted material is fair use.

The first-of-its-kind ruling that condones AI training as fair use will likely be viewed as a big win for AI companies, but ...

Ultimately, because authors introduced no evidence that Meta's AI threatened to dilute their markets, Chhabria ruled that ...

Copyrighted books can be used to train artificial intelligence models without authors’ consent, a federal judge ruled Monday ...

U.S. District Judge William Alsup of San Francisco said in a ruling filed late Monday that the AI system’s distilling from ...

Microsoft has been hit with a lawsuit by a group of authors who claim the company used their books without permission to ...

However, the judge simultaneously ordered the company to face trial this December for allegedly building a "central library" containing over 7 million pirated books, a decision ...

A federal judge said Meta and OpenAI's use of copyrighted works to train their Llama and ChatGPT AI model was "fair use." ...

SAN FRANCISCO, United States - A US federal judge has sided with Anthropic regarding training its artificial intelligence models on copyrighted books without authors' permission, a decision ...

Claude maker Anthropic's use of copyright-protected books in its AI training process was "exceedingly transformative" and fair use, US senior district judge William Alsup ruled on Monday.

As part of the AI model training process, Anthropic purchased copyrighted books and also used copyrighted works from piracy sites, with some overlap between the purchased and copyrighted works.