Can a non-human machine be an author under the Copyright Act of 1976? In a March 18, 2025 precedential opinion, a D.C. Circuit panel affirmed ...

Mr Thaler said that his “sentient” system created the image in his case independently. Read more at straitstimes.com.

A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence ...

Thaler, of St. Charles, Missouri, applied for a copyright in 2018 covering "A Recent Entrance to Paradise," a piece of visual art he said was made by his AI system.

A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law. The U.S. Court of ...

US Appeals Court Rejects Copyrights for AI-Generated Art Lacking 'Human' Creator By Blake Brittain A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed ...

WORKERS around the world fear they may be displaced by artificial intelligence (AI). — REUTERS/DADO RUVIC/ILLUSTRATION A FEDERAL appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of ...

eWEEK content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More. A recent legal ruling has sent shockwaves through the ...

March 18 - A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.