To understand the significance of this development, one must first grasp how the Chevron doctrine came about in the first place. This judicial principle, established in the 1984 case Chevron U.S.A. v.

The Supreme Court's decision last June to overturn the Chevron doctrine, a decades-long girding that underpinned regulatory authority, has rendered the regulatory landscape uncertain. But that ...

On Friday, the Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling along ideological lines, overturned Chevron and handed authority back to Congress and the courts. Overturning the doctrine is a significant ruling ...

In a landmark decision that has dramatically altered administrative law, the U.S. Supreme Court has dismantled the Chevron doctrine, a cornerstone of federal regulatory authority, following the ...

The Supreme Court in a vote of 6–3 overturned the so-called Chevron deference, a bureaucracy-empowering judicial doctrine ...

The Court in recent years has avoided Chevron deference. It is disinclined to find statutory text ambiguous. In appropriate cases, it applied the “major questions doctrine” to overturn agency ...

Defenders of Chevron say that it would unsettle precedent and violate the doctrine of stare decisis to overrule the decision, but Chevron itself unsettles both precedents and the expectations of ...

The overturning of the Chevron doctrine in June limits federal agencies' power. Deregulation delays could disappoint investors who've been pricing in less red tape since Trump's win. A recent ...

“At best, our intricate Chevron doctrine has been nothing more than ... devotes significant time and criticism to the various permutations of the various steps involved. His concurrence also ...