but also from Intel’s own last-gen Raptor Lake refresh. Even Intel itself can’t deny that performance-wise, the Core Ultra 9 285K and the Core i9-14900K are not that far off. Although the ...

Despite its different name, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K is essentially the Core i9-15900K, just with a much smaller number as its namesake. Intel effectively rebranded its Core series of ...

Intel primarily compares the new Core Ultra 9 285K to its last-gen Core i9-14900K desktop chip with the same $589-$599 MSRP and 125W base TDP. While the Ultra 9 285K has a lower 24 thread count ...

I hope Intel can continue building from the Core Ultra 9 285K to deliver highly efficient components, and based on my testing, it seems like even one generation down the road we’ll see an ...

The P-cores receive a claimed 9% IPC uplift. Intel has heavily focused on power efficiency and performance per watt for the Arrow Lake-S generation. The 285K's P-cores have a 3.7GHz base clock and ...

This analysis focused on the default values (without overclocking) in games with its own benchmark under the same conditions (1440p resolution) with which we did the analysis of the TUF Gaming ...

Intel claims its next-gen 'Panther Lake' mobile chips will combine ... at just 16 threads total. The Core Ultra 9 285H has six P-cores (Lion Cove), 8 E-cores (Skymont), and 2 Low-power E-cores.

The Intel Ultra 9 285H is rated as a 45W processor as standard ... But FSR will often provide better frame rates, and even has a frame generation feature. Perhaps more important is how well ...

I had high hopes for Arrow Lake, and of the two current-gen processor lines, it beats out archrival AMD's Ryzen 9000 series, which is a positive. However, the new Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel ...